|
Hey friend, How’s it going? 🌻 Let's start with the #3 edition of the Content Marketing Challenges series: How to showcase the impact of content on the pipeline based on basic attribution. Stay Tuned For Next Ones.... If you’re in B2B SaaS long enough, you must have heard this question: “Okay, but how much pipeline did content influence?” If you often struggle to answer this question, this edition is for YOU! I have talked about it all in bits and pieces before. This time I am compiling it all in this same edition. Today, I’ll show you how to break it down across:
Using nothing more than GA4, GSC, CRM data, AI-search tracking, and a simple sheet (Template below). 📚 If you have specific questions related to content attribution: Book a 30-minute consultation call with me! First thing first: Stop measuring “Content.” Start measuring funnel behavior.The biggest mistake I see (and have made in the past): marketers trying to attribute pipeline to content as a whole. Wrong framing. Pipeline influence shows up differently at each stage:
If you measure them all using “leads generated,” you’ll underreport 75% of your impact. So the strategy is simple: match the metric to the job of the content. TOFU: Prove it brings the right accounts inTOFU’s job is not conversion. It’s a qualified entry. What to track strategically:
For example, if a blog ranks for “topic cluster SEO” and appears in AI Overview, that’s not just traffic. That’s being part of early research conversations. Now the key move: once a month, pick 10 new pipeline accounts and check their first-touch page. If the same TOFU pages appear repeatedly, that’s evidence of pipeline seeding. You don’t need perfection. You need repetition. That’s how you show TOFU influence without pretending it closes deals. 💭 Personally, I am not a big believer in TOFU content. I wrote a post on why TOFU should be replaced by Thought-leadership. You might want to read it! MOFU: Prove it changes buyer intentMOFU is where people move from “interesting” to “we should evaluate this.” This is where engagement depth matters more than volume. What to look for:
If a blog has lower traffic but high engagement and consistent conversions, that’s not underperformance. That’s consideration-stage gravity. A strong MOFU signal looks like this: Blog → Newsletter → Return Visit → Demo Page View If that pattern exists, MOFU is influencing the pipeline. Your job isn’t to attribute revenue to the blog. It’s to show it sits in the decision path. BOFU: Prove acceleration, not just conversionBOFU is the easiest layer to validate — but only if you ask the right question. The right question is NOT: “Did this page convert?” You should rather ask: “Did this page show up in deals that moved forward?” Here’s what works in practice:
If the same 2–3 assets repeatedly show up in progressing deals, that’s pipeline acceleration. Want something stronger? Compare deal velocity between deals that used BOFU content and those that did not. Even a 10–15% faster close time is powerful proof. BOFU rarely creates demand. It removes friction. That’s measurable. 📚 I have covered BOFU Content attribution in detail in my e-book. Check it out here! Thought-Leadership: Prove category authorityThis is where I have struggled a lot because the impact is indirect. But indirect does not mean unmeasurable. Thought-leadership affects:
✅ If LinkedIn carousels consistently drive subscribers and inbound leads, that’s not “engagement.” That’s demand capture. ✅ If branded queries increase month-over-month after consistent thought-leadership publishing, that’s brand gravity. ✅ If prospects mention “I saw your LinkedIn post” in CRM notes, screenshot it. That’s attribution evidence. You don’t need volume. You need documented influence. Build evidence stacksAttribution without expensive software is not about precision. It’s about pattern recognition. You build an evidence stack across:
When you see patterns like:
That’s pipeline influence. What leadership really cares about (Especially in startups)They care about:
And yes — the template!The sheet is just documentation. It helps you:
But the strategy comes first.
That’s basic attribution done properly.
🗃️ More resources for content marketers from SaaS Splash Bulletin Archive
Check out my products purchased and loved by 200+ writers and marketersSay Hi! On LinkedIn 👋 P.S. Do you have any questions about the newsletter? Want to share your feedback? Feel free to reply to this email. Onwards and upwards, Sreyashi |
SaaS Splash Bulletin is for writers who want to become AI-proof Content Marketers | Every Saturday, 9:30 AM IST Sharp!
Hey friend, How’s it going? 🌻 I'm overwhelmed by all the responses! I am glad that you are finding it useful. Let's start with #2 edition: How to scale, execute, and repurpose content initiatives in a small content team. Stay Tuned For Next Ones.... February Sneak Peek! 📷 ༘ In the next 3 SaaS Splash Bulletin editions, I will discuss 3 critical challenges every content marketer faces in their new role and how to address them. The challenges are 😓: How to create and document a content strategy...
Hey friend, How’s it going? 🌻 As promised, let us kickstart this Content Marketer Challenges series with the #1 edition: How to create and document a content strategy. Stay Tuned For Next Ones.... February Sneak Peek! 📷 ༘ In the next 5 SaaS Splash Bulletin editions, I will discuss 5 critical challenges every content marketer faces in their new role and how to address them. The challenges are 😓: How to create and document a content strategy (This edition) How to scale, execute, and repurpose...
Hey friend, How’s it going? 🌻 Here's something I've been thinking about: two content marketers sit down to write about the same topic, let's say "remote team productivity." Same keyword/query research. Same competitors. Same SEO targets. Yet they produce completely different articles. Not slightly different. Significantly different. Why? Because they're operating inside different positioning constraints—and that positioning acts like a filter on every single content decision they make. I...